About us     Activities     Announcements     Contacts 
 Lithuania
 EU/NATO
 Russia
 Other countries
 Threats
 Energetics
 Reviews of the press
 Summer Academy
 Publications













   We recommend:







   Our sponsors:



 
Lithuania
 
  Lithuania and NATO: the road of hopes and doubts

Èeslovas Iðkauskas, political analyst
2012 04 16

Eight years ago, on 29 March 2004, Lithuania joined NATO. Today there are several aspects which should be discussed with regard to the membership. At the beginning let me remind several interim stops in Lithuania’s road toward the Alliance.

Prior to the Soviet Union’s collapse Lithuania could rely on the services of the Baltic Information Bureau which started functioning on 17 November 1990 in Brussels. This Bureau served as Lithuania’s diplomatic representation in the NATO and the EU.

Vytautas Landsbergis, Chairman of the Supreme Council of Lithuania, paid the first visit to the NATO Headquarters on 31 May 1991. On 4 January 1994 President Algirdas Brazauskas sent a letter to NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner expressing the desire of Lithuania to become a member of the Alliance. The official Lithuania’s mission to NATO was established on 1 August 1997.

Seven years prior to membership in the Alliance Lithuania has to do a considerable amount of “homework”, namely: implementation of various programs, action plans, NATO sessions (including the NATO Parliamentary Assembly Spring Session in Vilniusin 2001). On 29 March 2004, the then Lithuania’s Prime Minister Algirdas Brazauskas and Prime Ministers of Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia met in Washington and submitted the documents ratifying the Washington Treaty to the U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell. On this historic day Lithuania became a full-fledged member of NATO.

Since historically Lithuania was in the crossroad of various threats, it expected from the Alliance protection from possible dangers. The major hopes were related to Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty setting forth the principle of collective defense.

Lithuania experienced a new emotional uprising during the visit of the U.S. President George W.Bush in Vilnius in November 2002. Then the American leader said: “…anyone who would choose Lithuania as an enemy has also made an enemy of the United States of America. In the face of aggression, the brave people of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia will never again stand alone” and nearly the whole country rejoiced.

Is there any point in discussing the above?

In the website of the almanac “Politologija“ I found the article “Lithuania and NATO: Expectations and Reality” by a young political scientist Emilis Kazlauskas. According to the author, though membership in NATO is the main strategic imperative for Lithuania, “the Alliance cannot guarantee full security”. The author reminds the year 2005, when a Russian Su –27 jet fighter crashed in the territory of Lithuania (it has been flying in the skies of the country for about 30 minutes). Since NATO’s air police took off only two minutes before the crash of the jet fighter, Russian general V.Mikhailov said that this demonstrated the weakness of the NATO mission.

Unfortunately, the Alliance didn’t treat this as a significant incident and said that this is an issue of bilateral relations between Russia and Lithuania. According to “Eurasia Daily Monitor“, “...NATO’s official position that the three Baltic States’ air space would logically have presupposed assistance from NATO allies in investigating the incident, particularly since Lithuania lacked the means to cope on its own. Yet, NATO seemed to distance itself from this issue altogether. This shows an obvious lack of common identification by the NATO states.”

Emilis Kazlauskas also describes the background and sudden changes in the Defense Action Plan for the Baltic States established by the Alliance. NATO was busy with the problems of Afghanistan and Iraq, Russia was treated as a strategic partner, the United States pressed the “reset button” on U.S.-Russia relations, nuclear disarmament negotiations were underway, the countries tested each other on the deployment of the anti-missile defense system in Eastern Europe…

In view of this the above plans have been elaborated much later by the initiative of the general John Craddock. They are also mentioned in the NATO’s Strategic Concept which was approved in December of the last year. Yet, so far the draft document is kept secret, and a specific plan is still being coordinated.

In fact, this is the inner side of the Alliance’s activity. NATO members follow the above Strategic Concept approved in Lisbon on 19 November 2010. Article 5 of the Concept is defined as the ultimate goal of the organization. It is also a security guarantee for Lithuania.

Copyright: it is obligatory to indicate www.geopolitika.lt as a source in reprinting or otherwise using www.geopolitika.lt material.


   Print version
 
  Article has no comments
 
Name:
E-mail:
Comment:


Enter code:  

Use of juvenile, nonsensical and vulgar language prohibited.
 
 
Search




Alexander Parkhomenko. The pro-Russian (not already) President of Moldova, who was seated by the Russian Federation, stated about the way towards the EU

2016 12 02
Techno HUNDRED

"I back up": networks got surprised with the unexpected statement of the pro-Russian President Dodon about the EU.

The newly elected president of Moldova Igor Dodon, known for his pro-Russian views, stated that his country is not going to refuse from the cooperation with the European Union.


The new President of Moldova promised to keep all relations with the European Union

2016 11 18


Dodon said that President cannot be pro-Russian or pro-European and promised to protect the interests of Moldova.


The US imposed sanctions against six State Duma Deputies from Crimea

2016 11 17


The US imposed sanctions against six Ukraine State Duma deputies from the Crimea, reported the US Treasury Department.



Five countries have extended sanctions against Russia

2016 10 27

Five European countries following the EU extended sanctions against Russia, noted the EU head of diplomacy Federica Mogherini in the statement published on the website of the European Council.


Russia and India signed an agreement for the supply of S-400

2016 10 18


Russia and India signed an agreement for the supply of S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems. The contract was signed after the meeting of President Vladimir Putin and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the BRICS summit in Goa. Following the meeting, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi signed a series of agreements in the military-technical sphere at the BRICS summit in the state of Goa.


 

Copyright: it is obligatory to indicate www.geopolitika.lt as a source in reprinting or otherwise using www.geopolitika.lt material!

© 2005-2016 Geopolitiniø Studijø Centras